Tax workspace / answer contract
From question to evidence.
A static example of the JAN AI answer structure. Future answers require official source retrieval before synthesis.
Example question
Example only. Question submission and answer generation are not connected.
Static answer preview
Short answer
This example is ready for an evidence review, not a deduction decision. An invoice alone does not establish the final tax treatment.
What this depends on
- The business purpose of the maintenance
- Whether the work is a repair or a capital improvement
- Payment evidence and the applicable corporate tax rules
Source-backed explanation
The future answer will connect verified official passages to the expense facts. The attached CRA corpus entries are placeholders only. Retrieval is not connected, so this static example makes no tax eligibility determination.
Inspect source placeholders →Uploaded document facts used
- Vendor: North Pine Maintenance (fictional)
- Invoice date: November 18, 2025
- Amount: CAD 1,250.00
- Tax year: 2025
- Category: Clinic maintenance
Seeded facts only. No file was uploaded or extracted.
Assumptions
- The invoice belongs to the synthetic clinic
- The amount is shown as supplied, with no inferred tax allocation
Missing information
- Proof of payment
- A business purpose note and description of the work
- Verified official guidance applicable to this corporation and tax year
Sources
SRC-01 / Business expensesPlaceholder, not retrievedSRC-02 / Keeping recordsPlaceholder, not retrievedReview status
Awaiting advisorAdvisor review is required before any filing reliance.
View review packet →Evidence boundary
Retrieval requiredNo official passages have been retrieved. This example demonstrates the answer contract and makes no tax determination.
Another recent question
What is missing from our vehicle expense records?
Missing recordsNo answer prepared in this static preview.
Inspect vehicle summary →